AdvancedAxisandAllies.com

GROGnads · Major Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 177 Location: USA

For some people, then they'd ALLOW for even going about just prior to the 'bum~end' of the 1920s. Since some such as 'Mussolini' were IN "Power" at around this time, then I'd even ALLOW for much better 'beginnings'! MAYBE even 'allow' for SPAIN to fully participate on EITHER 'side'? well, once a 'decision' had been determined. Then what about if 'Germany' HAD "Won" in 'WW-I'? HA! then 'No Nazis!' as they'd have stayed "Imperial"! I luv it.

Quite the 'Campaign' GAME? eh?

GROGnads

Imperious Leader · leader Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 317

If Imperial Germany had won WW1 it would have cleared up a lot of problems later indeed. Just think if the Ottoman Empire kept together.. they would be even more powerful with all the oil producing nations under the banner of an empire. geez..

GROGnads · Major Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 177 Location: USA

After the end of ''the Great War'' and before ''W.W.2'', there were plenty of 'Conflicts' occurring worldwide and some are pretty obscure even today! We could get together with some others and bring these to light for many others to further 'enjoy' then. This way, we could introduce certain kinds of 'Units' that are currently being ignored or downplayed such as CAVALRY types, and these WERE created and used even during ''W.W.2''! The 'Don Cossacks' are a prime example and the Germans even 'created' their OWN 'Cossacks' as well. Just something else to keep in mind about.

Imperious Leader · leader Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 317

Yes i thought about having "calvary" but those nations that actually had this type of unit quickly learned never would they be effective in modern warfare. (poland,Germany, Soviets)